Original post can be found here.
Jane Jacobs was a journalist and community activist who is now widely considered a patron saint of urban planning. Her most famous work, published in 1961, is The Death and Life of Great American Cities. I recently read the book and am reflecting on what it tells us about Mapleton-Fall Creek.
Jacobs wrote at a time when cities looked at historic neighborhoods as “cancers†that should be bulldozed and replaced with utopian garden cities: high-rises separated by expanses of grass. She fought New York City when it wanted to tear down much of Greenwich Village to build a freeway through Washington Square. Although she was a successful community organizer, she is best remembered for the enduring quality of her ideas about how to foster great urban places.
According to Jacobs, urban places work best when they have diversity of uses, and this requires four conditions:
I think Mapleton-Fall Creek has a lot of these conditions and, perhaps more importantly, is well-positioned to improve these conditions in the next decade. We are talking about the triangular portion of midtown Indianapolis formed by 38th Street, Meridian, and Fall Creek:
Jacobs’ ideas are too good to ignore, but we must be very cautious in trying to apply them to Mapleton-Fall Creek. This is not Greenwich Village and does not have the level of density Jacobs explored. The introduction of The Death and Life of Great American Cities explicitly warns that her observations about big cities should not be transferred to little cities. And a lot has changed since 1961. Many people work from home, online shopping and big box stores have displaced small retailers, security cameras are new “eyes on the street,†and cars have become even more important to American transportation. Still, Jacobs’ ideas are more respected than ever. They do not apply to Mapleton-Fall Creek “off the shelf,†but with a little adaptation they have a lot to say about what has made our neighborhood great, and how we can make it better.
Hey Ryan, thanks for the insights.
A small quibble:
“cars have become more important to American transportation”
I’d rephrase this to say that we’ve designed American infrastructure to cater to the private automobile.
In a related note, I’d also argue that “important commuter arterials” are quite unimportant to your neighborhood. They bisect the neighborhood and create dangers for those interested in walking and biking. Be a place to go “to” not “through.” I don’t think removal of the traffic from Carmel and the donut townships from Mapleton Fall Creek would hurt any businesses in your neighborhood. In all likelihood, it would help immensely.
Regardless, I liked hearing your thoughts!
Those arteries aren’t even used by residents so much as they are for commuters (I’m one of these commuters). They basically act as moats inhibiting residents from using fall creek’s trails or getting to the other side of college without being run over.